There is a tendency in litigation for each new legal generation to re-invent the wheel and recently I have found myself arguing again, after a gap of some 15 years what I term the “comprehensive insurance point”.
In brief, it is the argument run by some insurance companies that a credit hire claimant with the benefit of a comprehensive insurance policy, who elects to hire a car on a credit hire basis rather than claim on their policy whether by obtaining a courtesy car or a cash benefit, fails to mitigate their loss.
These arguments were common in the early years of this century: as I recall district judges tended to like the point, whilst circuit judges did not.
In a recent case I argued in the County Court at Liverpool, Recorder Heaton QC accepted my arguments that despite having a comprehensive insurance policy, the claimant did not fail to mitigate his loss by refusing to claim upon his own insurance policy and instead electing to hire a replacement motorcycle on a credit hire basis.
A copy of the judgment can be found here: Recorder Civil Sharp Mark v Aviva Insurance Perfected reserved Judgment 251017.
If you have enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, then I would be pleased if you would subscribe to this blog by using the subscription form on the right hand side and you willl then receive email updates when I post a new article.